<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>derivative work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lquilter.net/blog/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lquilter.net/blog</link>
	<description>a reality-based, fantasy-influenced journal on information, autonomy &#38; the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>yes i am</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2010/01/16/yes-i-am</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2010/01/16/yes-i-am#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about this blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2010/01/16/yes-i-am</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[still on hiatus
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still on hiatus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2010/01/16/yes-i-am/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>what, still on hiatus?</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/12/31/what-still-on-hiatus</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/12/31/what-still-on-hiatus#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about this blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes. 
happy new year. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes. </p>
<p>happy new year. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/12/31/what-still-on-hiatus/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>hiatus &#8230; monthly update</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/11/30/hiatus-monthly-update</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/11/30/hiatus-monthly-update#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about this blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=1301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[still on hiatus!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still on hiatus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/11/30/hiatus-monthly-update/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>take 5 minutes &#8212; Congressmember hilariously questioned on Constitution</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/10/23/take-5-minutes-congressmember-hilariously-questioned-on-constitution</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/10/23/take-5-minutes-congressmember-hilariously-questioned-on-constitution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bills of Attainder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Broun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=1298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Rep. Alan Grayson questioned Rep. Paul Broun of Georgia on the meaning of Bills of Attainder, in regards to one of the anti-ACORN bills / amendments floating through Congress. Delightful.  I&#8217;m linking to it through Glenn Greenwald&#8217;s blog, who brought it to my attention, because Greenwald is almost always worth reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Rep. Alan Grayson questioned Rep. Paul Broun of Georgia on the meaning of Bills of Attainder, in regards to one of the anti-ACORN bills / amendments floating through Congress. Delightful.  <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/10/22/grayson/index.html">I&#8217;m linking to it through Glenn Greenwald&#8217;s blog, who brought it to my attention, because Greenwald is almost always worth reading.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/10/23/take-5-minutes-congressmember-hilariously-questioned-on-constitution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>libel and science</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/09/16/libel-and-science</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/09/16/libel-and-science#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/09/16/libel-and-science</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olivia Judd&#8217;s science blog in the NYT today is about the effect of libel on science writing &#8212; very interesting.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/cracking-the-spine-of-libel/">Olivia Judd&#8217;s science blog in the NYT today</a> is about the effect of libel on science writing &#8212; very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/09/16/libel-and-science/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; still on hiatus</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/08/31/still-on-hiatus</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/08/31/still-on-hiatus#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about this blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/09/16/still-on-hiatus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[on hiatus, but not dead.  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on hiatus, but not dead.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/08/31/still-on-hiatus/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sotomayor, Al Franken, the First Amendment, and information law</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/07/16/sotomayor-the-first-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/07/16/sotomayor-the-first-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freespeech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i.speech & first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=1282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some interesting commentary on Sotomayor and the First Amendment from Paul Levinson:
* http://paullevinson.blogspot.com/search/label/Sonia%20Sotomayor
* http://paullev.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=497539
* http://paullevinson.blogspot.com/search/label/Sonia%20Sotomayor
I haven&#8217;t had time yet to dig into Sotomayor on intellectual property, telecomm, and other information law issues, but this is discouraging. 
Franken of course I have hopes for:  After Fox News sued him for trademark infringement for putting its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting commentary on Sotomayor and the First Amendment from Paul Levinson:<br />
* http://paullevinson.blogspot.com/search/label/Sonia%20Sotomayor<br />
* http://paullev.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=497539<br />
* http://paullevinson.blogspot.com/search/label/Sonia%20Sotomayor</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had time yet to dig into Sotomayor on intellectual property, telecomm, and other information law issues, but this is discouraging. </p>
<p>Franken of course I have hopes for:  After Fox News sued him for trademark infringement for putting its logo &#8220;Fair and Balanced&#8221; on the cover of his book (<i>Lies and the Lying Liars Who tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right</i>) Franken ought to have a good sense of why trademark fair use, at least, is important. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/07/16/sotomayor-the-first-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>resurrecting my old abortion rights button</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/06/02/resurrecting-my-old-abortion-rights-button</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/06/02/resurrecting-my-old-abortion-rights-button#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Tiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right-wing violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=1269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I&#8217;m pro-choice and I shoot back.&#8221;
It&#8217;s not strictly true since I don&#8217;t own a gun.  
I love how Bill O&#8217;Reilly freely tosses around incendiary rhetoric (arguably, &#8220;inciting violence&#8221;) but is so incapable of taking responsibility or acknowledging his own words.  Why is he a frickin&#8217; pundit talking head if he thinks his words [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m pro-choice and I shoot back.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not strictly true since I don&#8217;t own a gun.  </p>
<p>I love how Bill O&#8217;Reilly freely tosses around incendiary rhetoric (arguably, &#8220;inciting violence&#8221;) but is so incapable of taking responsibility or acknowledging his own words.  Why is he a frickin&#8217; pundit talking head if he thinks his words are so meaningless?  Other than his ginormous ego?  <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/06/01/oreilly/index.html">War Room has relevant excerpts and links to O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s non-apology.</a></p>
<p><i>update:</i> More informative is <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/06/02/maddow_tiller/index.html">Rachel Maddow&#8217;s review of anti-abortion violence.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/06/02/resurrecting-my-old-abortion-rights-button/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>patented tail holes: patent reform</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/05/29/patented-tail-holes-patent-reform</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/05/29/patented-tail-holes-patent-reform#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whimsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cat diapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incontinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tail hole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=1266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God we so need patent reform.  What happened to the non-obviousness requirement?  Can someone please explain to me how a cat / dog diaper can have a &#8220;patented tail hole&#8221;????   What else would a pet diaper have except for a tail hole?  Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it is the knowledge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God we so need patent reform.  What happened to the non-obviousness requirement?  Can someone please explain to me how a cat / dog diaper can have a &#8220;patented tail hole&#8221;????   What else <i>would</i> a pet diaper have except for a tail hole?  Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it is the knowledge economy: the patenting of tail holes. </p>
<p>Available at PlanetUrine.com.  See also http://www.dog-diapers.net/catdiapers.html. I just love the URLs.</p>
<p>Description at http://pickyguide.com/pet_supplies/cat_diapers_guide.html:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Cat diapers are worn by cats</b> for trapping waste or urine. They are made like disposable baby diapers, only they are specifically designed for feline use. They are commonly used by cats with bladder or bowel problems or those who have undergone surgery.</p></blockquote>
<p>This paragraph is a masterpiece of stating the obvious.  </p>
<p>My partner notes, &#8220;My grandmother made really nice looking pants that were better looking than any of these, I&#8217;ll have you know. They were really good looking. &#8230; Can&#8217;t we just use some of Ada&#8217;s little newborn diapers, do you think?&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/05/29/patented-tail-holes-patent-reform/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a telling moment for the Catholic Church</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/05/20/a-telling-moment-for-the-catholic-church</link>
		<comments>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/05/20/a-telling-moment-for-the-catholic-church#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=1256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poor anti-same-sex-marriage crowd feels &#8220;outgunned and underfinanced&#8221; in their fight to prevent state recognition of same-sex couples.  In New York, for instance, the Catholic Church has been absent from the struggle. Why? 
The state’s Roman Catholic bishops have been somewhat distracted, too, having focused their lobbying energies this session on defeating a bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poor anti-same-sex-marriage crowd feels &#8220;outgunned and underfinanced&#8221; in their fight to prevent state recognition of same-sex couples.  In New York, for instance, the Catholic Church has been absent from the struggle. Why? </p>
<blockquote><p>The state’s Roman Catholic bishops have been somewhat distracted, too, having focused their lobbying energies this session on defeating a bill that would extend the statute of limitations for victims of sexual abuse to bring civil claims, and have appeared unprepared for the battle over marriage.<cite><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/nyregion/20marriage.html">NYT 5/20</a></cite></p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I think that pretty much sums up their values these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2009/05/20/a-telling-moment-for-the-catholic-church/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
