I’ll be watching Harvard’s A&S faculty vote today to see if they approve setting up a library-run faculty publications open access repository. (A proposal, I noted to my partner, that I first saw some 15 years ago in the library community.) The NYT covered the proposal.
For-profit scholarly publishers have of course been complaining vociferously about the trend toward scholars’ and faculty’s open access archives; scholarly societies less so. The for-profit scholarly publishers are in the same position as the recording industry: A set of middlemen that has profited from a technology that, for two centuries, made their business model profitable and even, in some cases, a virtual monopoly. Now that technology has moved on they feel insulted, as if they have a “god”-given right to their particular business model.
algorithmically similar posts:» bad bookstore business decisions, 2007-08-13 (score:27)
» notes on open scientific publishing, 2004-10-01 (score:23)
» Tweet: killer slides from Scott Lapinski @ Harvard HMS li…, 2013-01-26 (score:22)
» friday nights are so exciting!, 2008-02-29 (score:21)