I’ve written before about the ways in which criminalizing specific medical procedures — e.g., the “partial birth abortion act” — is a technological mandate. As a technological mandate, bans on specific abortion procedures are subject to all the same flaws, overreaches, underreaches, definitional problems, and obsolescence problems that mandates involving technological protection measures for copyrighted works are. As with people’s experiences with DRM, the best way to see the problems with these kinds of rules is to hear the stories of women who have had “partial birth abortions”. I encourage geek liberators to think about technological mandates more broadly.
algorithmically similar posts:» tech mandates and reproductive care, 2005-07-20 (score:44)
» Tweet: and … more technical mandates on medical procedu…, 2013-02-07 (score:28)
» new & fabulous uses for business method patents, 2007-05-16 (score:27)
» Tweet: #jmreagle’s comments about geek women never viewed…, 2013-02-22 (score:27)