tacky but lawful derivative liberty

A fundamentalist mega-church in Memphis has repurposed the Statute of Liberty. [7/5 nyt] Lucky for them the Statue is in the public domain. Shake your head at its awfulness at thestatueofliberationthroughchrist.org. Christian nationalism, indeed.
Maybe someone should remind them that the Statue’s French.
algorithmically similar posts:
» public domain charts, 2004-09-28 (score:23)» consumer copyright & access to knowledge report, 2006-03-30 (score:19)
» info news, 2004-11-09 (score:18)
» Tweet: #Sec108 #JaneGinsburg I am reminded of French scho…, 2013-02-08 (score:18)
Even if the Statue was not in the public domain, wouldn\’t it be legal to use it in a derivative work–under the doctrine of \”fair use\”? It seems that having the Statue hold a cross is political speech and the message is one that I whole-heartedly agree with, for ours is no longer a free nation but a xtian one.
You’re right, Michele. It’s as if you’ve studied copyright! Yes, this would be a protectable fair use even if Liberty were still in copyright.