<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: good reading [november edition]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2005/11/28/good-reading-november-edition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2005/11/28/good-reading-november-edition</link>
	<description>a reality-based, fantasy-influenced journal on information, autonomy &#38; the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: derivative work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; bias [draft]</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2005/11/28/good-reading-november-edition/comment-page-1#comment-24622</link>
		<dc:creator>derivative work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; bias [draft]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=445#comment-24622</guid>
		<description>[...] NYPL hosted a panel a few weeks ago on the Google Print issue. I noticed that there were no women on the panel. This was shortly after I&#8217;d seen a flyer for a conference Yale was hosting on Search, which also had very very few numbers of female speakers or commentators. I&#8217;d been trying to craft a cogent &amp; reasoned critique of sexism in the industry and practices that lead to gender disparate conference panels in a field where, if anything, a majority of leading scholars are women. In the meantime, Ann Bartow wrote on the matter, and I linked to her in lieu of posting separately, and then I got focused on other things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NYPL hosted a panel a few weeks ago on the Google Print issue. I noticed that there were no women on the panel. This was shortly after I&#8217;d seen a flyer for a conference Yale was hosting on Search, which also had very very few numbers of female speakers or commentators. I&#8217;d been trying to craft a cogent &#38; reasoned critique of sexism in the industry and practices that lead to gender disparate conference panels in a field where, if anything, a majority of leading scholars are women. In the meantime, Ann Bartow wrote on the matter, and I linked to her in lieu of posting separately, and then I got focused on other things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

