<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: missing-non-white-women meme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2005/08/08/missing-non-white-women-meme/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2005/08/08/missing-non-white-women-meme</link>
	<description>a reality-based, fantasy-influenced journal on information, autonomy &#38; the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: derivative work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Juarez: missing-non-white-women meme, at work?</title>
		<link>http://lquilter.net/blog/archives/2005/08/08/missing-non-white-women-meme/comment-page-1#comment-6790</link>
		<dc:creator>derivative work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Juarez: missing-non-white-women meme, at work?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lquilter.net/blog/?p=383#comment-6790</guid>
		<description>[...] Searching the NYT archives since 1996 (&#8221;missing women maquiladoras&#8221;, &#8220;missing women Juarez&#8221;) I found a couple of others; one from Dec. 2002; one from Aug. 2002 focusing on a filmmaker doing a documentary about the issue; and one from Aug. 2003; another from Oct. 2004. I won&#8217;t do the word count; it&#8217;s embarrassing, since many of these articles appear in the short-shrift foreign desk section. But by comparison a search for &#8220;Natalee Holloway&#8221;, missing in Mexico, turned up 17 articles since June. With this relative level of media coverage, I&#8217;m certainly glad to see this year&#8217;s story about the Juarez disappearances actually make the front webpage of the NYT. [Well, for a couple of hours it did, anyway, as one of three articles in the NATIONAL subsection.] Maybe the missing-non-white-women meme is starting to spread? Or maybe there&#8217;s some natural spillover effect from the missing-white-women coverage? every twenty articles about a missing white woman the NYT can run one about a non-white-woman human interest story? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Searching the NYT archives since 1996 (&#8221;missing women maquiladoras&#8221;, &#8220;missing women Juarez&#8221;) I found a couple of others; one from Dec. 2002; one from Aug. 2002 focusing on a filmmaker doing a documentary about the issue; and one from Aug. 2003; another from Oct. 2004. I won&#8217;t do the word count; it&#8217;s embarrassing, since many of these articles appear in the short-shrift foreign desk section. But by comparison a search for &#8220;Natalee Holloway&#8221;, missing in Mexico, turned up 17 articles since June. With this relative level of media coverage, I&#8217;m certainly glad to see this year&#8217;s story about the Juarez disappearances actually make the front webpage of the NYT. [Well, for a couple of hours it did, anyway, as one of three articles in the NATIONAL subsection.] Maybe the missing-non-white-women meme is starting to spread? Or maybe there&#8217;s some natural spillover effect from the missing-white-women coverage? every twenty articles about a missing white woman the NYT can run one about a non-white-woman human interest story? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

