copy & photo shops behaving stupidly around copyright
Friday, June 17th, 2005 2:37 am
» Tweet: #Sec108 Schwartz: 2 options, private agreement, OR…, 2013-02-08 (score:30)
» excellent reading, 2005-05-20 (score:27)
» technological mandates, 2007-05-19 (score:26)
I’ve heard stories like this before, but this AP article [boston.com 6/16] has more discussion about the problems caused by private third-party policing of copyrights.
algorithmically similar posts:
» shades of the Pinkertons, 2008-05-07 (score:36)» Tweet: #Sec108 Schwartz: 2 options, private agreement, OR…, 2013-02-08 (score:30)
» excellent reading, 2005-05-20 (score:27)
» technological mandates, 2007-05-19 (score:26)
[...] Thus, some photofinishing labs (like Wal-Mart) have taken to refusing to duplicate photos that look ‘professional’ unless the holder has permission from the photographer. [See 5/30 story in sandiego.com; related commentary & links Ex Cathedra 6/8; Derivative Work 6/17] [...]