The plaintiff and the defendant were in a long-term committed relationship. Early in the morning of September 24, 1994, they were engaged in consensual sexual intercourse. The plaintiff was lying on his back while the defendant was on top of him. The defendant’s body was secured in this position by the interlocking of her legs and the plaintiff’s legs. At some point, the defendant unilaterally decided to unlock her legs and place her feet on either side of the plaintiff’s abdomen for the purpose of increasing her stimulation. When the defendant changed her position, she did not think about the possibility of injury to the plaintiff.
(italics added by me)
algorithmically similar posts:» stem cell research standing, 2010-08-25 (score:23)
» a few choice ID-related quotes, 2005-12-13 (score:23)
» Lake Tahoe heating up, 2004-12-21 (score:19)
» creationist & religious violence against science & education, 2008-04-22 (score:17)