Forget Grokster, which is the entertainment industry’s attempt to get Sony reviewed & overturned, by trying to generate a circuit split out of the dicta in Aimster.
An actual circuit split in the making is on sampling, with the Beastie Boys’ 9th circuit decision today declining to reconsider its Nov. 4, 2003, decision (Newton v. Diamond) permitting sampling. [The article was published tomorrow, 11/11, in Australia, relating to a decision from today, 11/10, in California.] [iptablog 11/4] This is in contrast with the be
knighted* decision out of the 6th Circuit a few months ago which held that you have to get a license to sample, period. [Bridgeport Music v. Dimension Films, 6th Cir., Sept. 7, 2004] The recording industry has asked for that decision to be reheard en banc.
* Why do I do that? I know there’s not a “k” in benighted. What, like it has to do with being granted an honorary “title” … I really find myself making many more spelling and homonym spelling errors in my mid-30s than I did in my youth. What’s that all about?
algorithmically similar posts:» info cases, 2004-10-06 (score:28)
» ip cites, 2004-09-07 (score:27)
» roommates.com: no 230 safe harbor for discriminatory housing ads, 2008-04-03 (score:25)
» circuit split on sex toys, 2008-02-14 (score:23)