same-sex marriage decisions
October 6th, 2004 9:23 am
- Newfoundland, Canada: lawsuit launched for same-sex marriage [365gay.com 11/5]
- 2004-11-05: Saskatchewan legalized same-sex marriage, the 7th Canadian province to do so (British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, and the Yukon Territory). Four of the plaintiff couples sought to get married in Saskatchewan and a fifth couple sought recognition of its British Columbian marriage. Oral arguments heard Wed, 11/3. [365gay.com 11/5]
- 2004-11-04: Oral arguments before Judge Kramer, in the California Superior Court, where the City of San Francisco is challenging Prop. 22 (the “Knight” Initiative) on state Constitutional equal protection grounds. California AG Lockyer defended Prop 22 as did intervenor Alliance Defense Fund.
- 2004-11-03: Every freakin’ anti-SSM amendment passed.
- 2004-10-29 Friday: Germany expanded rights for same-sex couples, allowing registered DPs to adopt each other’s children. Germany retained restrictions on non-stepparent adoption. Germany also extended various marriage laws governing the dissolution of marriages to same-sex couples. [365gay.com 10/29]
- 2004-10-27: Georgia said it won’t consider the validity of its opposite-sex-only marriage amendment until it’s been voted on. [nyt]
- Louisiana said its recently-passed opposite-sex-only marriage amendment didn’t pass muster, because it had multiple purposes. (Amendments can have only one purpose.) Still looking for a copy of the decision …
- 2004-Sept: Canadian provinces Manitoba and Nova Scotia ruled for same-sex marriage.
- California Superior Court, 2004-Sept-8, ruling that California AB 205 did not violate Proposition 22. [decision posted at NCLR] Prop 22, the “Knight Initiative”, statutorily defined marrage in California as between a man and a woman. The court held that domestic partnerships are distinct from marriage.
- California Supreme Court, 2004-Aug-12, ruling that San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom exceeded his authority in permitting city officials to marry same-sex couples, and holding the several thousand marriages legally void. [decision posted at NCLR]